Main news
28.10.2008
New political prisoner appeared in Belarus
20.10.2008
Journalist Vieranika Charkasava Assassinated Four Years Ago
09.10.2008
Review-chronicle of human rights violations in Belarus in September 2008
29.09.2008
Parliamentary Election: Human Rights Defenders draw preliminary conclusions
28.09.2008
INFORMATION FOR JOURNALISTS (updated)
28.09.2008
Pre-election campaigning. Monitoring: results and conclusions
22.09.2008
Election week: events and generalizations
17.09.2008
Valiantsin Stefanovic: authorities have another chance to prosecute opposition members
15.09.2008
Human rights center
08.09.2008
Review-chronicle of human rights violations in Belarus in July-August 2008
05.09.2008
Elections: analysis of the stage of registration of candidates
02.09.2008
Past week of the electoral campaign: events and generalizations


POLICE IDENTIFIED STRANGER THREATENING BDG JOURNALIST The stranger, calling journalist Iryna Makavetskaya in the middle of the night and threatening her with death, turned out to be Viachaslaw Bulkin, 25, staff member of Homel state-owned TV and Radio company.

21.01.2004.

Press service of the Belarusian Association of Journalists reports, the police refused to start proceedings on the case of telephone threats in the night of January 11. Iryna Makavetskaya learned that on January 20 from Valery Stryhalow, head of Chyhunachny borough Police Department #2. In the end of last week the police identified the stranger. It turned out to be Viachaslaw Bulkin, 25, employee of Homel TV and Radio company. However, the law-enforcing bodies did not consider his actions a crime.
On Sunday Viachaslaw Bulkin had to right an explanation note. He wrote he called Iryna with the purpose to "express his opinion", claiming he had no malicious aforethought and no intent to make short shrift of the journalist. He motivated his actions by the fact that Iryna worked for an opposition newspaper and spread information, which "did not correspond to reality". He also claimed he did not know Iryna personally and promised not to bother her anymore.

Obviously, the law-enforcing bodies decided those explanations completely justified him. The journalist is indignant at the refusal of the police to launch criminal proceedings against Bulkin. Besides that, she doubts that he has acted independently: Mr. Bulkin called her at 4 a.m. He claims he found out her home phone number in a database at work. Iryna believes, this is the evidence that he had an "aforethought". Besides that, Bulkin, an employee of the TV and Radio company, did not know her personally, but was surprisingly well aware of her articles and trials she wrote about.

Add commentary

Вы павінны зарэгістравацца or ўвайсьці ў сыстэму , каб мець магчымасьць пакідаць камэнтары

Comments

No commentaries for this article

rating all.by Яндекс цитирования