Main news
12.07.2010
Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in June 2010
28.06.2010
In Support of Autukhovich
21.06.2010
FIDH and Viasna urge Belarusian authorities to promptly render medical aid to Atukhovich
07.06.2010
Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in May 2010
31.05.2010
Joint Statement by the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the Human Rights Center ‘Viasna’
21.05.2010
Ales Bialiatski: ‘We must take every measure possible to stop the escalation of tension and hysteria created by the authorities ahead of the presidential election’
18.05.2010
Human rights groups condemn two new Belarus death sentences
17.05.2010
Violent dispersal and detentions of participants of Gay Pride in Minsk are violation of right to freedom of peaceful assembly and manifestation of discrimination
09.05.2010
Statement of Human Rights Defenders on Autukhovich's case
09.05.2010
Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in April 2010
04.05.2010
Public statement by Human Rights Center ‘Viasna’ concerning search at Zmitser Salauyou’s office in Navapolatsk
28.04.2010
Preliminary results of monitoring of the 2010 Local Council Elections


Human rights defenders: granting parole to Yauhen Yakavenka doesn’t solve his problem

23.07.2010. Tags: amnesty, alternative service, Belarusian Christian Democracy.

On 23 July the panel of judges on criminal cases of the Homel Region Court headed by Judge Liudmila Hrynko, amnestied Yauhen Yakavenka, a member of the Belarusian Christian Democracy , conscientious objector to the military service.

Members of the Human Rights Center Viasna believe that the existing problems with the alternative civilian service and the discrimination of the Belarusian language will still result in the criminal persecution of draftees. The human rights defenders Anatol Paplauny and Leanid Sudalenka who monitored the criminal proceedings of Mr. Yakavenka think that the court decision doesn’t solve the problem on its merits.

’The questions of office work in the Belarusian language in the military enlistment offices and the alternative civilian service need to be solved urgently, ‘says L.Sudalenka. ‘The panel of judges has issued a compromising verdict today, freeing Yauhen Yakavenka from the punishment by granting him parole. However, when another drafting campaign starts, he will again demand a writ in the Belarusian language and will be brought to criminal responsibility again.’

’The state doesn’t implement its duties in this case, as we have two state languages. Receiving a writ in the Belarusian language and being assigned to an alternative civilian service are the constitutional rights of a draftee,’ emphasizes A.Paplauny.

According to Article 17 of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus, the state languages of the Republic of Belarus are Belarusian and Russian. Article 20 of the Law On Languages determines that Belarusian and/or Russian are to be used in the army and other armed formations of the Republic of Belarus.

Article 57 of the Constitution states tat the rules of the military service, the reasons and conditions for release from the military service or its replacement with an alternative civilian service are determined by the law. In 2000 the Constitutional Court adopted a ruling aimed at replacement of the military service to an alternative civilian service for those who refused to serve in the army because of religious convictions. The ruling states that the Constitution doesn’t consider the military service as the only and unconditional variant and admits the possibility of freeing persons from the military service or its replacement with an alternative civilian service.

Bear in mind that on 4 June the Tsentralny District Court of Homel had sentenced Yauhen Yakavenka to a year of personal restraint for alleged draft-dodging. The Human Rights Center Viasna immediately informed the international human rights organization Amnesty International about it. AI officially expressed its support to Mr. Yakavenka. The Belarusian human rights defenders will also urgently inform the organization about the results of the consideration of the cassation complaint of the defendant by the Homel Region Court.

Add commentary

Вы павінны зарэгістравацца or ўвайсьці ў сыстэму , каб мець магчымасьць пакідаць камэнтары

Comments

No commentaries for this article


RATING ALL.BY Яндекс цитирования